# Reported phone numbers in Burkina Faso (+226)

> Phone numbers with spam or scam signals observed in Burkina Faso, aggregated from independent
> complaint sources and the Numbers Online community. Everything on this page is a
> supplementary signal — advisory, not a verdict — and personal numbers are never listed.

- Numbers with signals: 131
- Reports across sources: 139
- Active last 30 days: 8
- Latest activity: 2026-11-08
- Aggregates refreshed: 2026-11-15

## Recently active numbers (24 shown)

| Number | Trust | Category | Reports | Sources | Last activity | Lookup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2266694000 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-11-08 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/2266694000 |
| +2260355470 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-11-03 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/2260355470 |
| +226408101 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-11-03 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/226408101 |
| +226289298 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-11-03 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/226289298 |
| +226022060 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-11-03 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/226022060 |
| +2269944513 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-11-03 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/2269944513 |
| +226699350 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-11-03 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/226699350 |
| +2263152548 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-11-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/2263152548 |
| +22678757551 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-11-20 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22678757551 |
| +22651774804 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2024-11-11 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22651774804 |
| +22670996008 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996008 |
| +22670996057 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996057 |
| +22670996079 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996079 |
| +22670996087 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996087 |
| +22670996096 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996096 |
| +22670996120 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996120 |
| +22670996122 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996122 |
| +22670996126 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996126 |
| +22670996130 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996130 |
| +22670996144 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996144 |
| +22670996997 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996997 |
| +22670996292 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996292 |
| +22670250628 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670250628 |
| +22670996006 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/22670996006 |

Freshness reflects when a source last observed activity — never when we crawled it.
Full history and scoring on each number's lookup page. Trust is 0–100, higher = better.

## What gets reported

- Reported activity — 107
- Phishing / smishing — 18
- Ping call — 6

## Most-reported prefixes

- +226 709 — 16
- +226 770 — 14
- +226 707 — 6
- +226 702 — 5
- +226 606 — 4
- +226 622 — 4
- +226 715 — 4
- +226 631 — 3

Number ranges where signal numbers cluster. A prefix itself is never bad — plenty of
legitimate numbers share it.

## Other countries

- [United States](https://numbers.online/md/browse/us) — 3.2M numbers with signals
- [Poland](https://numbers.online/md/browse/pl) — 129.8K numbers with signals
- [Germany](https://numbers.online/md/browse/de) — 36.3K numbers with signals
- [Lithuania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/lt) — 25.9K numbers with signals
- [United Kingdom](https://numbers.online/md/browse/gb) — 19K numbers with signals
- [Romania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ro) — 5,082 numbers with signals
- [Italy](https://numbers.online/md/browse/it) — 4,590 numbers with signals
- [Spain](https://numbers.online/md/browse/es) — 4,571 numbers with signals
- [Denmark](https://numbers.online/md/browse/dk) — 3,790 numbers with signals
- [Portugal](https://numbers.online/md/browse/pt) — 3,438 numbers with signals

---

Numbers Online — community-powered phone-number trust signals. Every figure on this
page is a supplementary, low-confidence signal — advisory, not a verdict on any number
or its owner.

- Canonical page (HTML): https://numbers.online/browse/bf
- Report a call: https://numbers.online/report · Listed in error? Request removal: https://numbers.online/opt-out
- Machine guide to the phone-intelligence API: https://numbers.online/llms.txt · OpenAPI: https://numbers.online/api/spec