# Reported phone numbers in Luxembourg (+352)

> Phone numbers with spam or scam signals observed in Luxembourg, aggregated from independent
> complaint sources and the Numbers Online community. Everything on this page is a
> supplementary signal — advisory, not a verdict — and personal numbers are never listed.

- Numbers with signals: 27
- Reports across sources: 214
- Active last 30 days: 9
- Latest activity: 2026-10-22
- Aggregates refreshed: 2026-10-25

## Recently active numbers (24 shown)

| Number | Trust | Category | Reports | Sources | Last activity | Lookup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +35227943439 | Very risky (12/100) | Telemarketing | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-22 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35227943439 |
| +352621894325 | Very risky (0/100) | Ping call | 2 | 1 | 2026-10-21 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352621894325 |
| +35220880706 | Very risky (12/100) | Harassment | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-19 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220880706 |
| +35220880715 | Very risky (12/100) | Telemarketing | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-15 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220880715 |
| +35220882104 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-14 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220882104 |
| +35220880664 | Very risky (12/100) | Phishing / smishing | 2 | 1 | 2026-10-13 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220880664 |
| +352621497089 | Very risky (12/100) | Ping call | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-13 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352621497089 |
| +35220880708 | Very risky (12/100) | Harassment | 1 | 1 | 2026-10-13 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220880708 |
| +35220601281 | Very risky (1/100) | Reported activity | 78 | 1 | 2026-10-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220601281 |
| +35228431841 | Very risky (0/100) | Harassment | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-07 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35228431841 |
| +352621816864 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352621816864 |
| +35228431828 | Low (25/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35228431828 |
| +352679018738 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352679018738 |
| +35227689870 | Very risky (0/100) | Harassment | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-04 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35227689870 |
| +352651234456 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352651234456 |
| +352621554713 | Fair (50/100) | Robocall | 1 | 1 | 2026-06-30 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352621554713 |
| +35228431858 | Low (25/100) | Phishing / smishing | 4 | 1 | 2026-06-25 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35228431858 |
| +35228431859 | Low (25/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-06-24 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35228431859 |
| +352671533116 | Fair (50/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-06-16 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352671533116 |
| +352661220032 | Fair (50/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-06-03 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352661220032 |
| +352681932210 | Very risky (12/100) | Phishing / smishing | 2 | 1 | 2026-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/352681932210 |
| +35228431493 | Very risky (15/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2026-01-13 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35228431493 |
| +35220607395 | Very risky (3/100) | Reported activity | 102 | 1 | 2025-09-24 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220607395 |
| +35220213488 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2022-09-23 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/35220213488 |

Freshness reflects when a source last observed activity — never when we crawled it.
Full history and scoring on each number's lookup page. Trust is 0–100, higher = better.

## What gets reported

- Reported activity — 10
- Phishing / smishing — 8
- Harassment — 4
- Ping call — 2
- Telemarketing — 2
- Robocall — 1

## Most-reported prefixes

- +352 208 — 5
- +352 284 — 5
- +352 621 — 4
- +352 698 — 3
- +352 206 — 2
- +352 202 — 1
- +352 276 — 1
- +352 279 — 1

Number ranges where signal numbers cluster. A prefix itself is never bad — plenty of
legitimate numbers share it.

## Other countries

- [United States](https://numbers.online/md/browse/us) — 3.1M numbers with signals
- [Poland](https://numbers.online/md/browse/pl) — 115.4K numbers with signals
- [Germany](https://numbers.online/md/browse/de) — 36K numbers with signals
- [Lithuania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/lt) — 25.8K numbers with signals
- [United Kingdom](https://numbers.online/md/browse/gb) — 17.4K numbers with signals
- [Romania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ro) — 5,046 numbers with signals
- [Italy](https://numbers.online/md/browse/it) — 4,437 numbers with signals
- [Denmark](https://numbers.online/md/browse/dk) — 3,593 numbers with signals
- [Spain](https://numbers.online/md/browse/es) — 3,346 numbers with signals
- [Morocco](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ma) — 3,328 numbers with signals

---

Numbers Online — community-powered phone-number trust signals. Every figure on this
page is a supplementary, low-confidence signal — advisory, not a verdict on any number
or its owner.

- Canonical page (HTML): https://numbers.online/browse/lu
- Report a call: https://numbers.online/report · Listed in error? Request removal: https://numbers.online/opt-out
- Machine guide to the phone-intelligence API: https://numbers.online/llms.txt · OpenAPI: https://numbers.online/api/spec