# Reported phone numbers in Malawi (+265)

> Phone numbers with spam or scam signals observed in Malawi, aggregated from independent
> complaint sources and the Numbers Online community. Everything on this page is a
> supplementary signal — advisory, not a verdict — and personal numbers are never listed.

- Numbers with signals: 380
- Reports across sources: 393
- Active last 30 days: 0
- Latest activity: 2026-07-12
- Aggregates refreshed: 2026-09-14

## Recently active numbers (24 shown)

| Number | Trust | Category | Reports | Sources | Last activity | Lookup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2657130072 | Low (25/100) | Reported activity | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-12 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/2657130072 |
| +2658368671 | Low (25/100) | Reported activity | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-12 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/2658368671 |
| +265891161634 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161634 |
| +265891161497 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161497 |
| +265887660447 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265887660447 |
| +265889999910 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265889999910 |
| +265889999935 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265889999935 |
| +265889999942 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265889999942 |
| +265891160555 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891160555 |
| +265891160798 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891160798 |
| +265891161029 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161029 |
| +265891161059 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161059 |
| +265891161233 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161233 |
| +265891161253 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161253 |
| +265891161264 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161264 |
| +265891161365 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161365 |
| +265891161444 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161444 |
| +265891161489 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161489 |
| +265891161463 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161463 |
| +265891161752 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2026-04-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265891161752 |
| +265999999038 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2026-03-30 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265999999038 |
| +265999999006 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2026-03-30 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265999999006 |
| +265999999020 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2026-03-30 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265999999020 |
| +265999999022 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2026-03-30 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/265999999022 |

Freshness reflects when a source last observed activity — never when we crawled it.
Full history and scoring on each number's lookup page. Trust is 0–100, higher = better.

## What gets reported

- Reported activity — 328
- Ping call — 45
- Phishing / smishing — 7

## Most-reported prefixes

- +265 888 — 129
- +265 884 — 50
- +265 880 — 40
- +265 886 — 32
- +265 889 — 31
- +265 881 — 19
- +265 999 — 15
- +265 891 — 14

Number ranges where signal numbers cluster. A prefix itself is never bad — plenty of
legitimate numbers share it.

## Other countries

- [United States](https://numbers.online/md/browse/us) — 3M numbers with signals
- [Poland](https://numbers.online/md/browse/pl) — 87K numbers with signals
- [Germany](https://numbers.online/md/browse/de) — 34.8K numbers with signals
- [Lithuania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/lt) — 25.6K numbers with signals
- [United Kingdom](https://numbers.online/md/browse/gb) — 14.6K numbers with signals
- [Romania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ro) — 4,911 numbers with signals
- [Italy](https://numbers.online/md/browse/it) — 3,373 numbers with signals
- [Denmark](https://numbers.online/md/browse/dk) — 3,292 numbers with signals
- [Morocco](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ma) — 3,255 numbers with signals
- [Tunisia](https://numbers.online/md/browse/tn) — 2,424 numbers with signals

---

Numbers Online — community-powered phone-number trust signals. Every figure on this
page is a supplementary, low-confidence signal — advisory, not a verdict on any number
or its owner.

- Canonical page (HTML): https://numbers.online/browse/mw
- Report a call: https://numbers.online/report · Listed in error? Request removal: https://numbers.online/opt-out
- Machine guide to the phone-intelligence API: https://numbers.online/llms.txt · OpenAPI: https://numbers.online/api/spec