# Reported phone numbers in Sierra Leone (+232)

> Phone numbers with spam or scam signals observed in Sierra Leone, aggregated from independent
> complaint sources and the Numbers Online community. Everything on this page is a
> supplementary signal — advisory, not a verdict — and personal numbers are never listed.

- Numbers with signals: 298
- Reports across sources: 319
- Active last 30 days: 0
- Latest activity: 2026-06-21
- Aggregates refreshed: 2026-09-14

## Recently active numbers (24 shown)

| Number | Trust | Category | Reports | Sources | Last activity | Lookup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2323745628 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 7 | 1 | 2026-06-21 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/2323745628 |
| +23272282014 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282014 |
| +23272282056 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282056 |
| +23272282066 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282066 |
| +23272282144 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282144 |
| +23272282319 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282319 |
| +23272282336 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282336 |
| +23272282368 | Very risky (0/100) | Reported activity | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282368 |
| +23272282451 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282451 |
| +23272282486 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282486 |
| +23272282505 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282505 |
| +23272282598 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282598 |
| +23272282628 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282628 |
| +23272282673 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282673 |
| +23272282701 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282701 |
| +23272282852 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282852 |
| +23272282857 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282857 |
| +23272282878 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282878 |
| +23272282902 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282902 |
| +23272282933 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282933 |
| +23272282977 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272282977 |
| +23272675009 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272675009 |
| +23272675095 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272675095 |
| +23272675467 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-06-02 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/23272675467 |

Freshness reflects when a source last observed activity — never when we crawled it.
Full history and scoring on each number's lookup page. Trust is 0–100, higher = better.

## What gets reported

- Reported activity — 212
- Ping call — 62
- Phishing / smishing — 24

## Most-reported prefixes

- +232 218 — 27
- +232 211 — 23
- +232 722 — 20
- +232 216 — 17
- +232 228 — 17
- +232 213 — 13
- +232 220 — 13
- +232 210 — 12

Number ranges where signal numbers cluster. A prefix itself is never bad — plenty of
legitimate numbers share it.

## Other countries

- [United States](https://numbers.online/md/browse/us) — 3M numbers with signals
- [Poland](https://numbers.online/md/browse/pl) — 87K numbers with signals
- [Germany](https://numbers.online/md/browse/de) — 34.8K numbers with signals
- [Lithuania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/lt) — 25.6K numbers with signals
- [United Kingdom](https://numbers.online/md/browse/gb) — 14.6K numbers with signals
- [Romania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ro) — 4,911 numbers with signals
- [Italy](https://numbers.online/md/browse/it) — 3,373 numbers with signals
- [Denmark](https://numbers.online/md/browse/dk) — 3,292 numbers with signals
- [Morocco](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ma) — 3,255 numbers with signals
- [Tunisia](https://numbers.online/md/browse/tn) — 2,424 numbers with signals

---

Numbers Online — community-powered phone-number trust signals. Every figure on this
page is a supplementary, low-confidence signal — advisory, not a verdict on any number
or its owner.

- Canonical page (HTML): https://numbers.online/browse/sl
- Report a call: https://numbers.online/report · Listed in error? Request removal: https://numbers.online/opt-out
- Machine guide to the phone-intelligence API: https://numbers.online/llms.txt · OpenAPI: https://numbers.online/api/spec