# Reported phone numbers in Zambia (+260)

> Phone numbers with spam or scam signals observed in Zambia, aggregated from independent
> complaint sources and the Numbers Online community. Everything on this page is a
> supplementary signal — advisory, not a verdict — and personal numbers are never listed.

- Numbers with signals: 122
- Reports across sources: 156
- Active last 30 days: 0
- Latest activity: 2026-07-12
- Aggregates refreshed: 2026-09-14

## Recently active numbers (24 shown)

| Number | Trust | Category | Reports | Sources | Last activity | Lookup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +26022602 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-12 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/26022602 |
| +26042604 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-12 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/26042604 |
| +26082608 | Very risky (15/100) | Reported activity | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-12 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/26082608 |
| +260954435430 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-11-18 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260954435430 |
| +260954435477 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2025-11-18 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260954435477 |
| +260779472522 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 3 | 1 | 2025-04-30 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260779472522 |
| +260967784580 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2025-03-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260967784580 |
| +260764444390 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 5 | 1 | 2024-02-12 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260764444390 |
| +260971642869 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2023-12-09 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260971642869 |
| +260972643533 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2023-11-25 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260972643533 |
| +260777652159 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2023-11-14 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260777652159 |
| +260777964644 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2023-09-13 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260777964644 |
| +260966161516 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2023-09-10 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260966161516 |
| +260771225141 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2023-09-06 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260771225141 |
| +260776153956 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2023-07-29 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260776153956 |
| +260961493624 | Fair (45/100) | Reported activity | 2 | 1 | 2023-06-25 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260961493624 |
| +260979196010 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260979196010 |
| +260970073173 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260970073173 |
| +260970413530 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260970413530 |
| +260970442262 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260970442262 |
| +260974632222 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260974632222 |
| +260976999005 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260976999005 |
| +260976999072 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260976999072 |
| +260970015383 | Very risky (0/100) | Phishing / smishing | 1 | 1 | 2022-11-28 | https://numbers.online/md/lookup/260970015383 |

Freshness reflects when a source last observed activity — never when we crawled it.
Full history and scoring on each number's lookup page. Trust is 0–100, higher = better.

## What gets reported

- Reported activity — 109
- Phishing / smishing — 11
- Ping call — 2

## Most-reported prefixes

- +260 963 — 17
- +260 950 — 15
- +260 955 — 7
- +260 970 — 7
- +260 965 — 6
- +260 976 — 6
- +260 971 — 5
- +260 964 — 4

Number ranges where signal numbers cluster. A prefix itself is never bad — plenty of
legitimate numbers share it.

## Other countries

- [United States](https://numbers.online/md/browse/us) — 3M numbers with signals
- [Poland](https://numbers.online/md/browse/pl) — 87K numbers with signals
- [Germany](https://numbers.online/md/browse/de) — 34.8K numbers with signals
- [Lithuania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/lt) — 25.6K numbers with signals
- [United Kingdom](https://numbers.online/md/browse/gb) — 14.6K numbers with signals
- [Romania](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ro) — 4,911 numbers with signals
- [Italy](https://numbers.online/md/browse/it) — 3,373 numbers with signals
- [Denmark](https://numbers.online/md/browse/dk) — 3,292 numbers with signals
- [Morocco](https://numbers.online/md/browse/ma) — 3,255 numbers with signals
- [Tunisia](https://numbers.online/md/browse/tn) — 2,424 numbers with signals

---

Numbers Online — community-powered phone-number trust signals. Every figure on this
page is a supplementary, low-confidence signal — advisory, not a verdict on any number
or its owner.

- Canonical page (HTML): https://numbers.online/browse/zm
- Report a call: https://numbers.online/report · Listed in error? Request removal: https://numbers.online/opt-out
- Machine guide to the phone-intelligence API: https://numbers.online/llms.txt · OpenAPI: https://numbers.online/api/spec